Thu. 24 Apr 2025
☀️ 26°C in Dublin
🎮 Games
Date: 23-apr-2025
Image by Alfredo Rivera from Pixabay
April 23, 2025 — Menlo Park, CA — WhatsApp is facing criticism after confirming that its newly integrated Meta AI assistant—represented by a blue circle icon—cannot be removed or disabled by users, despite being described as an “optional” feature.
Earlier this year, Meta introduced its proprietary AI assistant directly into WhatsApp, aiming to offer users quick access to AI-powered responses and support. The assistant is accessible via a persistent icon in the app's chat list interface and can answer questions, generate content, and suggest features.
While Meta has marketed the tool as "optional," users are pointing out that the AI’s interface presence is permanent and cannot be hidden or removed.
Unlike traditional app features that can be toggled off or hidden, Meta AI appears as a fixed chat within the app—even if the user chooses not to engage with it. The tool cannot be disabled via settings or privacy menus, prompting backlash from privacy advocates and casual users alike.
Though WhatsApp reassures users that personal chats remain end-to-end encrypted, interactions with Meta AI are not. These chats may be stored and used to improve Meta’s machine learning models—raising serious concerns around data collection and consent.
“Labeling a feature as ‘optional’ when it cannot be disabled is misleading at best,” said Kate O’Flaherty, cybersecurity journalist. “It undermines user autonomy and stretches the boundaries of privacy norms, especially in regulated markets like the EU.”
While there is no way to disable Meta AI entirely, users can take limited steps:
However, none of these actions will remove the blue AI icon from the interface.
Meta has defended the feature, calling it “a helpful assistant embedded into the platform,” and hinted at future controls for personalization. But as of now, no official opt-out method exists.
With stricter digital privacy laws in the EU and other regions, Meta could soon face regulatory scrutiny over the feature’s forced integration. Legal experts are already debating whether the practice complies with GDPR's consent requirements.
No comments yet! Be the first one to comment.
